GuidesCampus Build Guide

Deliver

Projects and submissions

Teams of 2 to 5 submit a working demo, a video, a repository, and a README that says who did what.

View the checklist
A campus organiser with a clipboard waving people in

Step by step

Do this first.

Project submissions

Deliver

Project submissions

Swipe

One team per member

Every member is registered and on exactly one team.

Show the working solution

Required: project name, problem and solution, working demo, 2 to 3 minute video.

Provide accessible code

Required: repository with commit history, README, setup instructions, and technologies.

Record contributions

The README names each member's contribution and discloses templates, libraries, prior work, and AI use.

Start at kickoff

Work starts at kickoff unless a continuation track was pre-approved.

Check completeness

You check completeness, not winners. Escalate suspected copying with evidence; never accuse publicly.

Read the full chapter

Teams have 2–5 members unless the event page states another approved maximum. Every member must be registered and attached to exactly one team for the event.

Required submission

• Project name; problem, target user, and a concise solution description. • Working demo or deployment and a 2–3 minute demo video usable by remote judges. • Repository or b54-accessible code, readable commit history, README, setup instructions, and technologies used. • A README naming team members and the specific contribution of each person. • README disclosure of templates, starter kits, libraries, pre-existing work, generated assets, and AI-assisted work.

The standard track starts at kickoff. Public libraries, documented APIs, disclosed AI tools, and announced starter kits are allowed. Continuing work belongs only in a pre-approved continuation track and must show the exact before-and-after scope. A copied project, false contribution, hidden prior product, inaccessible code, non-working demo, or unexplained single final code dump can be ruled ineligible.

The Campus Rep checks completeness, not winners. Do not alter a team’s submission after the deadline. Escalate suspected plagiarism or fabrication with evidence; do not accuse teams publicly.